ArticleInternational archives of allergy and immunology2026
Erratum.
Article in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the article "Global Estimates of Vaccine-Associated Hepatic Autoimmune Disorders and Their Related Vaccines, 1968-2024: An International Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database" [Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(7):696-702; https://doi.org/10.1159/000542865] by Jeong et al., the following is being corrected by the authors.Following a recent communication from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring), which provided the dataset used in this study, the authors were informed of the need to correct specific information to ensure full accuracy and consistency with Uppsala Monitoring Centre's data use policies. The authors confirm that this correction does not affect the main results, interpretations, or conclusions of the study.The details of the corrections are as follows:The methods of the article stated that the Vigibase database "encompasses over 140 million cases." This is being corrected to "over 35 million cases."In addition, in the Methods section and Statement of Ethics of the article, the following was listed:"This study protocol was reviewed and approved by Kyung Hee University and the Uppsala Monitoring Centre, approval number (KHUH 2022-06-042)."The corrected text is the following:"Approval for using confidential and electronically processed patient data was granted by the Institutional Review Boards of Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KHUH 2022-06-042), and access to the data was obtained from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO Collaborating Center)."Furthermore, the following text is being added to the Acknowledgments section of the article:"The authors acknowledge that some terms and statements in this manuscript ('association' or 'vaccine-associated') may be interpreted as implying causality or formal clinical guidance, which was not intended. The dataset is derived from a spontaneous reporting system (disproportionality analysis) and therefore does not permit the estimation of incidence or prevalence. Accordingly, these findings should be interpreted with caution and should not be used as a basis for clinical decision-making. 'Vaccine-associated hepatic autoimmune disorders' was identified through disproportionality analysis, which does not imply a causal relationship. As this study was focused on signal detection, caution is warranted in interpreting the terminology used."The original online article has been updated to reflect the above.
Identifiers
42574309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.