Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574298›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Bedtime Audiobook Listening Motives and Insomnia Status: Survey Study.

Karl Berglund, Elisa M S Meth, Pei Xue, Christian Benedict

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karl BerglundDepartment of Literature and Rhetoric, Uppsala University, Box 632, Uppsala, SE-751 26, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7280-1112
Elisa M S MethDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 591, Uppsala, 751 24, Sweden, +46 70 425 0215.ORCID 0000-0003-4232-8242
Pei XueDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 591, Uppsala, 751 24, Sweden, +46 70 425 0215.ORCID 0000-0002-0364-2936
Christian BenedictDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 591, Uppsala, 751 24, Sweden, +46 70 425 0215.ORCID 0000-0002-8911-4068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many individuals use audiobooks at bedtime to unwind and facilitate sleep, yet little is known about how this practice relates to sleep health. Understanding these patterns may inform behavioral strategies to support sleep. Objective: This study aimed to examine associations between bedtime audiobook listening, perceived sleep benefits, and sleep-onset insomnia symptoms in a large adult sample. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 1136 Swedish adults (aged ≥50 years: n=600, 53%; women: n=1027, 90%). Recruitment took place in Sweden between January and February 2026 through social media, university campus flyers, and book-related media outlets. Respondents reported bedtime audiobook listening frequency, motives, preferred genres, and sleep characteristics. Sleep-related variables included the frequency and duration of difficulty initiating sleep. Sleep-onset insomnia symptom status (absent, subthreshold, and clinical level) was derived using symptom-based criteria. Clinical-level sleep-onset insomnia symptoms were defined as difficulty falling asleep ≥3 times per week for ≥3 months, and subthreshold sleep-onset insomnia symptoms were defined as either difficulty falling asleep 1 to 2 times per week for ≥3 months or ≥3 times per week for <3 months. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation was used to examine associations between audiobook use, perceived sleep benefits, and insomnia symptom status, with adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs reported. Results: Among the self-selected sample of 1136 Swedish adults, 53% (n=601) listened to audiobooks daily at bedtime. Sleep-onset insomnia symptoms were common in this sample (those reporting clinical-level or subthreshold symptoms: n=427, 38%), although these estimates should be interpreted in the context of the recruitment approach and may not reflect population prevalence. Daily listeners had a higher prevalence of reporting that audiobooks helped them fall asleep (aPR 1.32, 95% CI 1.21-1.44) and improved overall sleep (aPR 1.73, 95% CI 1.41-2.12), whereas clinical-level sleep-onset insomnia symptoms were associated with a lower prevalence of reporting perceived benefit for falling asleep (aPR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.98). Daily listeners also had a higher prevalence of reporting difficulty falling asleep without an audiobook (aPR 1.93, 95% CI 1.67-2.22). Participants with sleep-onset insomnia symptoms had a higher prevalence of using audiobooks to reduce worry or racing thoughts (subthreshold symptoms: aPR 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.55; clinical-level symptoms: aPR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.49), while daily listeners had a higher prevalence of selecting the same audiobook at bedtime (aPR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.26) and a lower prevalence of preferring nonfiction (aPR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). Conclusions: Bedtime audiobooks may be perceived to serve different roles depending on sleep health, with cognitive regulation motives more frequently reported among individuals with sleep-onset insomnia symptoms. Owing to the cross-sectional design, it remains unclear whether audiobook use influences sleep-related experiences or whether individuals with particular sleep characteristics are more likely to adopt audiobooks as a bedtime strategy.

Indexed as

MotivationSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleepSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenadultsaudiobooksbedtime routinessleepsleep-onset insomniaSweden

Identifiers

PMID42574298
PMCPMC13455850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.