ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2026
Patient-Reported Quality of Life in Lung Transplantation: Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung transplantation (LTx) is an established treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases and can substantially improve survival. However, posttransplant recovery involves complex physical, psychological, and functional challenges, making quality of life (QoL) an important outcome beyond survival alone. Evidence on early longitudinal QoL changes after LTx remains limited, particularly in Chinese recipients and when assessed using disease-specific patient-reported outcome instruments. Objective: This study aimed to assess QoL and track its longitudinal changes in patients who underwent LTx using a disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument. Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study screened 66 patients for enrollment who underwent LTx at the Xi'an Jiaotong University Lung Transplantation Center in China from June 2023 to December 2025. QoL was assessed using the Chinese version of the Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire at baseline (preoperative) and serially at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months after surgery. The Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire comprises 40 items across 7 domains, and each domain score was calculated as the item mean (range 0-4). Random-intercept linear mixed models (LMMs) with both categorical and linear time specifications were fitted separately for each domain to evaluate longitudinal changes, accounting for repeated measures and incomplete follow-up under the missing at random assumption. Results: A total of 203 interviews from 51 eligible patients were included in this study, with a median of 5 (IQR 2-6) interviews for each patient. LMM analysis revealed significant overall time effects in 6 of 7 domains (likelihood ratio test: P<.01 in all cases). Health perceptions showed the earliest and largest improvement (LMM-adjusted mean difference [MD] -1.58 at month 6; β=-0.23 points per month; P<.001), followed by respiratory symptoms (MD -0.95 at month 6; β=-0.15 per month), anxiety and depression (MD -0.82 at month 6; β=-0.13 per month), digestive symptoms (MD -0.50 at month 6; β=-0.10 per month), and cognitive limitations (MD -0.51 at month 6; β=-0.09 per month; P<.001 in all cases). Global well-being was the only domain with a positive trajectory (MD 1.18 at month 6; β=0.13 per month; P=.002), with significant improvement already evident at month 1 (MD 0.71; P=.23). Conclusions: LTx significantly improved QoL in patients with end-stage lung diseases, with the most substantial gains in health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. Patient-reported outcome-based monitoring can capture clinically meaningful QoL changes and should be integrated into routine posttransplant care to identify critical intervention time points and optimize long-term recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.