ArticleJMIR nursing2026
Inpatient Nurses' Anticipatory Perspectives on Assistive Robots: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assistive robots have been proposed to support nursing work by offloading routine, logistical, and physically demanding tasks. However, existing research has largely focused on postimplementation acceptance or usability, with fewer studies examining how nurses conceptualize assistive robots before routine deployment, particularly in settings where exposure remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to explore inpatient nurses' anticipatory perspectives on assistive robots and to examine how perceived benefits, concerns, and implementation conditions are constructed at the preimplementation stage. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semistructured, face-to-face interviews with 16 registered nurses aged 21 to 32 years from 4 general medical wards in a public tertiary hospital in Singapore. At the time of data collection, assistive robots had not been routinely implemented; participants' exposure was limited to pilots, demonstrations, and indirect sources. Interview transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Participants' accounts reflected anticipatory acceptance characterized by cautious optimism regarding the potential of assistive robots to support nursing work, alongside concurrent concerns about safety, professional identity, relational care, and implementation feasibility. Four themes were developed: anticipatory optimism shaped by indirect exposure; negotiating uncertainty, safety, and professional boundaries; imagining assistive robots as workload and workflow support; and conditions for responsible implementation. Concerns centered on professional identity, patient safety, ethical boundaries, loss of human touch, technical reliability, cost-effectiveness, and organizational feasibility. Participants viewed assistive robots as acceptable only if they were integrated into nursing workflows, preserved clinical judgment and relational care, and were supported by training, technical infrastructure, leadership commitment, and clear governance. Conclusions: Nurses' anticipatory perspectives suggest that acceptance of assistive robots depends not only on perceived usefulness, but also on alignment with professional values, patient safety, relational care, and organizational readiness. Early nurse involvement, human-centered implementation, structured training, and clear governance are needed to ensure that assistive robots augment rather than undermine nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.