Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574201›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2026

Status Dystonicus: An Updated Review on Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Management.

Vedang N Desai, Arunav Garg, Arnesh Bhattacharya, Mahak Golani, Debashish Chowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vedang N DesaiDepartment of Neurology, Gobind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India.
Arunav Garg
Arnesh Bhattacharya
Mahak Golani
Debashish Chowdhury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Status dystonicus (SD), also called dystonic storm or dystonic crisis historically, represents a rare and life-threatening exacerbation of dystonia characterized by continuous (tonic) or phasic rapidly recurring dystonic spasms. Common triggers include infections, abrupt changes in medication, and metabolic stress, among others, and necessitate early recognition with multidisciplinary management to prevent multisystemic failure or dysfunction. SD arises in patients with generalized dystonia, more commonly in those with secondary causes, and is associated with basal ganglia dysfunction and predominantly dopaminergic disturbances. The Dystonia Severity Action Plan is a widely accepted staging tool that requires bedside assessment and helps inform therapeutic decisions and intervention levels. Management principles center on identifying and removing triggers, optimizing sedation and airway management, and administering disease-specific therapies. The review aims to provide an overview of the clinical spectrum, the physiological basis, commonly described precipitating factors, and updated management strategies for SD, highlighting a practical approach to the early identification of the syndrome and the bundling of care. A narrative review of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted, with emphasis on publications covering etiopathogenesis, risk factors, clinical grading systems, therapeutic options, and outcomes. Key consensus guidelines and case series were appraised. It is evident that early diagnosis and triage, with adequate management, are key to improving survival and neurological outcomes in SD. Adoption of standardized clinical pathways and multicenter data reports will help improve understanding of SD's natural history, clinical evaluation, and therapeutic efficacy across different etiologies.

Indexed as

dystonia emergencyDystonia Severity Action Plandystonic storm/crisismanagement protocolStatus dystonicus

Identifiers

PMID42574201
PMCPMC13544879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.