Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574014›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Community-Based Surgery and Postoperative Survival Among Veterans Affairs Enrollees.

Vadim M Shteyler, Yanting Luo, Alfred C Kuo, James C Iannuzzi, Mary A Whooley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vadim M ShteylerDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco.
Yanting LuoSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.
Alfred C KuoSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.
James C IannuzziSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California.
Mary A WhooleyDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Veterans Affairs Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (VA MISSION) Act of 2018 greatly expanded Veterans Affairs (VA) enrollees' access to non-VA (community care) services. Since then, community-based utilization has increased substantially, but the quality of noncardiac surgical procedures has not been compared in VA and community care facilities. Objective: To compare surgical outcomes among veterans at VA vs community care facilities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used adjusted restricted mean survival time (RMST) to compare survival at 30, 90, and 365 days after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), cholecystectomy (CCY), primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), and primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among VA enrollees at VA and community care facilities between October 1, 2019, and July 31, 2024. Follow-up was completed July 31, 2025. Exposure: CEA, CCY, THA, and TKA performed at VA vs community care settings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjusted RMST at 30, 90, and 365 days. Results: A total of 215 542 unique surgical procedures-87 653 in VA-based and 127 889 in community-based facilities-were observed. The mean (SD) age of patients was 65.6 (11.7) years; 191 958 procedures (89.1%) were performed in male patients, and 94 105 (43.7%) were performed in patients who lived in rural or highly rural areas. Actuarial mortality rates were meaningfully higher for community-based CEA (30 days, 1.6% vs 0.9%; 90 days, 3.0% vs 2.0%; and 365 days, 8.5% vs 6.3%) and CCY (30 days, 1.4% vs 0.5%; 90 days, 2.6% vs 1.0%; and 365 days, 5.7% vs 2.8%) but similar for TKA (30 days, 0.1% vs 0.2%; 90 days, 0.4% vs 0.3%; and 365 days, 1.3% vs 1.2%) and THA (30 days, 0.3% vs 0.2%; 90 days, 0.7% vs 0.5%; and 365 days, 2.0% vs 1.7%). After CEA in a VA setting, adjusted survival times at 30 days increased by 0.12 (95% CI, 0.04-0.21) days; at 90 days, by 0.82 (95% CI, 0.45-1.19) days; and at 365 days, by 7.11 (95% CI, 4.71-9.51) days. After CCY in a VA setting, adjusted survival times at 30 days increased by 0.14 (95% CI, 0.11-0.18) days; at 90 days, by 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67-0.96) days; and at 365 days, by 6.20 (95% CI, 5.33-7.06) days. After THA in a VA setting, adjusted survival at 30 days increased by 0.002 (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.02) days; at 90 days, by 0.07 (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.16) days; and at 365 days, by 0.44 (95% CI, -0.17 to 1.05) days. After TKA in a VA setting, adjusted survival at 30 days increased by 0.004 (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.01) days; at 90 days, by 0.01 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.04) days; and at 365 days, by 0.31 (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.65) days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, veterans who underwent surgery at community care vs VA facilities had significantly decreased survival times at 30, 90, and 365 days after CEA and CCY and similar survival times after THA and TKA. The reasons for these survival differences deserve further study.

Indexed as

VeteransAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCholecystectomyEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID42574014
PMCPMC13458859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.