ArticleJAMA network open2026
Physical Fitness and All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Regular physical activity promotes healthy aging, yet clinical risk stratification in older adults relies largely on comorbidity burden, often overlooking functional capacity. Objective fitness assessment may serve as a clinically relevant indicator of physiological reserve, but evidence from large cohorts evaluating multiple fitness domains remains limited. Objective: To evaluate associations between objectively measured physical fitness across multiple domains and all-cause mortality in older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cohort study included community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who completed standardized fitness assessments in Taiwan between January 11, 2015, and November 25, 2016. Participant data were linked to National Health Insurance records, with follow-up through December 31, 2022. Statistical analyses were conducted between July 1, 2025, and May 30, 2026. Exposures: Physical fitness was assessed across 4 domains: cardiorespiratory fitness (2-minute step test), muscular strength (30-second arm curl and chair stand tests), flexibility (back scratch and chair sit-and-reach tests), and balance and agility (1-leg stance and 8-foot up-and-go tests). A composite fitness index was constructed by summing sex-specific percentile ranks across all 7 assessments. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was all-cause mortality, ascertained through linkage with the National Health Insurance death registry. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs), adjusting for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and self-reported physical activity. Results: Of 13 423 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.9 [6.1] years; 8394 female [62.5%]), 1631 (12.2%) died during a median (IQR) follow-up of 7.0 (6.7-7.1) years. Compared with the lowest performance quintile, participants in the highest performance quintile had lower all-cause mortality across 4 physical fitness assessments: 8-foot up-and-go (AHR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.33-0.51]), 1-leg stance (AHR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.42-0.59]), 30-second chair stand (AHR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.46-0.65]), and 2-minute step test (AHR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.68]). The composite fitness index showed the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (AHR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.32-0.48]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of older adults, objectively measured physical fitness-particularly balance and agility, lower-body strength, and cardiorespiratory fitness-was associated with lower all-cause mortality in a graded manner. These findings suggest that integrating objective fitness assessments into routine practice may refine risk stratification and guide function-oriented interventions in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.