Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42574011›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Cancer Screening and Citizenship Status in the US.

Jenny S Guadamuz, Stacy Chen, Gregory S Calip, Arturo Vargas Bustamante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenny S GuadamuzDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Stacy ChenDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Gregory S CalipProgram on Medicines and Public Health, Alfred Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Arturo Vargas BustamanteProgram on Medicines and Public Health, Alfred Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Immigrants without US citizenship, or noncitizens, disproportionately endure poverty, labor exclusions, and inadequate health care access-structural drivers of adverse cancer outcomes. While screening is critical for preventing cancer deaths, and cancer is the leading cause of death among noncitizens, little is known about citizenship status and its potential influence on cancer screening. Objectives: To examine cancer screening inequities associated with citizenship status, evaluate whether these inequities vary across states, and determine whether structural factors mediate these inequities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (2010-2023). Eligibility for cancer screening and the timing and types of tests considered appropriate were determined using US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Exposure: Citizenship status: noncitizen (regardless of documentation), naturalized, or US-born. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included colorectal, cervical, or breast cancer screening. Potential mediators included socioeconomic and health care factors (eg, poverty-to-income ratio and insurance), whereas clinical factors (eg, cancer history) were considered confounders. Mediation analysis using nonlinear multiple additive regression tree models was performed to evaluate associations between citizenship status and cancer screening and to identify mediators. Results: The sample included 131 501 participants eligible for colorectal (3687 [5.1%] noncitizen, median [IQR] age, 61.1 [55.0 to 67.0] years, 39 040 [47.8%] male), cervical (6812 [10.2%] noncitizen, median [IQR] age 41.1 [30.0-52.0]), or breast (1815 [5.1%] noncitizen, median [IQR] age 60.8 [55.0-66.0]) cancer screening. In 2023, noncitizens had significantly lower colorectal (43.6%; 95% CI, 38.7%-48.4% vs 75.5%; 95% CI, 74.6%-76.5%), cervical (57.1%; 95% CI, 53.1%-61.0% vs 71.6%; 95% CI, 70.3%-72.8%), and breast (73.0%; 95% CI, 66.4%-78.7% vs 80.1%; 95% CI, 78.8%-81.3%) cancer screening rates than US-born citizens. These citizenship-based disparities were observed throughout the study period and were present in many states. Noncitizens had significantly lower odds of receiving colorectal (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.32-0.38), cervical (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.38-0.44), and breast (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.62) cancer screenings than US-born citizens, with socioeconomic and health care factors jointly mediating these inequities (proportion mediated, colorectal cancer: 56.6%; 95% CI, 49.1%-64.2%; cervical cancer: 39.6%; 95% CI, 32.3%-47.0%; breast cancer: 97.1%; 95% CI, 87.1%-107.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationally representative study, noncitizens had lower rates of cancer screenings, an inequity largely explained by socioeconomic barriers and inadequate health care access. Efforts to increase cancer screening and reduce preventable cancer mortality among noncitizens should focus on improving their health care access.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealthcare DisparitiesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42574011
PMCPMC13458871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.