Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573999›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2026

Shift-adjusted Neyman-Pearson classifiers via single index modeling (SACSIM).

Jiaming Qiu, Ying-Qi Zhao, Yingye Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiaming QiuBiostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2174-0337
Ying-Qi ZhaoBiostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-2257
Yingye ZhengBiostatistics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-4200

Funding

The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
Precompetitive Collaboration on Liquid Biopsy for Early Cancer Assessment: Data Management and Coordinating UnitU24CA288185 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Wei Sun, Yingye Zheng · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Statistical Methods for Prospective Evaluation of BiomarkersR01CA236558 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHENG, YINGYE · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
Developing methods for advancing the early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma leveraging electronic medical records dataR01CA289668 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI SURESH T. CHARI, Yingqi Zhao · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236558NCI NIH HHS R01 CA289668NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24 CA288185NIH HHS R01 CA236558NIH HHS R01 CA289668NIH HHS U24 CA086368NIH HHS U24 CA288185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neyman-Pearson (NP) classifiers, which aim to maximize the clinical benefit while adhering to risk constraints, are crucial in many practical fields, including early cancer detection. However, applying these classifiers can be challenging due to discrepancies between the data distributions of the source and target populations. The potential impact can be disproportionately severe for under-represented groups. We propose a semi-parametric model-based approach for adapting NP classifier decision rules to different populations while equitably controlling classification errors specific to clinical applications. Our method involves a shift-adjustment strategy that leverages a small unlabeled sample from the target population, along with minimal auxiliary information and the labeled source data. This approach enhances the applicability of the learned decision rules and ensures they are consistently tailored for the target population. We demonstrate the performance through theoretical studies and simulations and illustrate the approach with an example of a prostate cancer study.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsComputer SimulationEarly Detection of CancerHumansProstatic Neoplasmsdata shiftdensity ratioNeyman–Pearson classifiersample weightingunlabeled target data

Identifiers

PMID42573999
PMCPMC13455594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.