ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Diagnosis classification in EMR data using latent representations and SNOMED-CT mapping for improved medical data integration.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating medical data across hospitals has become a critical challenge in medical informatics, largely due to the heterogeneity of electronic medical record (EMR) systems. This study aims to address this issue by developing a diagnosis classification model that automatically maps diagnosis spans in EMR data to the standardized clinical ontology Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT). We trained an embedding-based model, ClinicalBERT, on EMR data to obtain latent representations of diagnosis spans. These representations were aligned with SNOMED-CT fully specified names (FSNs) through mean squared error (MSE)-based fine-tuning and subsequently used to construct a downstream classification model. In addition, we analyzed the latent representations to investigate semantic alignment and structural characteristics in the latent space. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.934, a weighted F1-score of 0.923, and a macro-averaged F1-score of 0.823 on 273 SNOMED-CT classes. Despite improved semantic alignment, the fine-tuned model demonstrated performance comparable to the base ClinicalBERT model, while remaining competitive with state-of-the-art approaches such as SapBERT (accuracy: 0.944) and BioSyn (accuracy: 0.931). Representation analysis further revealed improved clustering coherence, as evidenced by reduced similarity distances and more distinct class separation. This approach demonstrates strong potential for scalable and privacy-preserving medical concept normalization in real-world clinical environments. Fine-tuning improved semantic alignment, reducing the average Manhattan and cosine distances by 36.2% and 53.1%, respectively. Moreover, the integration of classification and representation analysis provides insights into the trade-off between semantic alignment and discriminative performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573973What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.