ReviewClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2026
Diagnostic strategies, test accuracy, and misdiagnosis of POTS: a narrative review of diagnostic criteria, tests, and diagnostic delay.
Review in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome is defined by a sustained heart rate increment upon upright posture without orthostatic hypotension. Despite established criteria, the condition remains frequently underdiagnosed. This narrative review evaluates diagnostic strategies, test accuracy, diagnostic delay, and misdiagnosis patterns.
methodsFollowing prospective registration in PROSPERO (CRD 1248964), 7 databases were searched without date restriction. Eligible studies enrolled individuals aged 12 years or older undergoing evaluation for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and reported diagnostic accuracy, criteria performance, or delay and misdiagnosis data. Dual-reviewer screening and standardized data extraction were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and ROBINS-I. Narrative synthesis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
resultsIn total, 26 studies met inclusion criteria, enrolling more than 30,000 participants across multiple countries. Diagnostic criteria varied in heart rate thresholds, tilt angle, and test duration. Abbreviated 2-min tilt testing missed 55% of confirmed cases (95% confidence interval 48-63%). Active standing tests achieved areas under the curve of 0.855-0.925 with time-of-day-standardized thresholds. Tachycardia mimicking the syndrome occurred in 26-44% of vasovagal syncope patients during tilt. Two large surveys (n = 13,754) documented a median diagnostic delay of 24 months; approximately 75-76% reported prior misdiagnosis, most frequently attributed to psychological or psychiatric conditions.
conclusionsPostural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome diagnosis is compromised by protocol heterogeneity, abbreviated testing, physiological mimicry, and a pattern of psychiatric misattribution. Standardization of tilt and standing test protocols, clinician education, and structured diagnostic pathways are warranted.
trial registrationPROSPERO Registration: CRD1248964.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.