ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Defining a Clinically Meaningful Within-Person Change Threshold for the Psychomotor Vigilance Test in Narcolepsy Type 1.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds for the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) and evaluate whether treatment with the orexin-2 receptor agonist oveporexton (TAK-861) achieved clinically meaningful improvements in attention in people with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).
methodsAttention was assessed as number of lapses (reaction times > 500 ms) on the PVT using data from 2 randomized placebo-controlled phase III trials, The First Light (N = 166) and The Radiant Light (N = 105). Anchor-based methods, supported by distribution-based methods, were used to derive MWPC estimates. Mean changes in square root-transformed PVT lapses (to account for data skewness) were calculated across anchor change categories, with weighted MWPC estimates derived across anchors. Estimates were confirmed with post-hoc receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The proportions of participants meeting MWPC criteria were compared between oveporexton and placebo arms, with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsAcross both trials, participants reporting minimal, much, or very much improvement demonstrated progressively fewer PVT lapses. Anchor- and distribution-based analyses supported a reduction of ≥ - 2 PVT lapses, confirmed by ROC curves, as indicating a meaningful improvement in attention. Applying this threshold to unblinded samples, clinically meaningful improvement in attention at day 84 was reported in 66.9% of oveporexton-treated participants versus 25.7% of placebo-treated participants in The First Light and 57.6% versus 17.6% in The Radiant Light (both P ≤ 0.0001).
conclusionsImprovements in attention with oveporexton in people with NT1 were found to be clinically meaningful, with improvement of ≥ - 2 PVT lapses significantly more likely to occur with oveporexton versus placebo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.