ArticleJournal of community health2026
How Healthy Are Community Health Workers: Findings from a Chicago-Area Survey.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community health workers (CHWs) are a growing and essential component of the U.S. healthcare workforce, yet little is known about their own health and well-being. The CHWs Our Work + Our Health Pilot Study administered a cross-sectional survey to a convenience sample of CHWs living and/or working in the Chicago metropolitan area. The survey assessed general health, chronic conditions, health behaviors, and mental health using validated, standardized measures. Prevalence estimates were compared to Chicago population data using two-proportion z-tests. The final analytic sample included 179 CHWs, predominantly female (85.5%), Hispanic (63.7%) or non-Hispanic Black (32.4%). CHWs reported significantly worse outcomes than the general Chicago population in general health, mental distress, emotional support, and sleep, while reporting lower rates of hypertension, obesity, and high cholesterol. Nearly one-third reported fair or poor health and nearly 40% reported inadequate emotional support. Economic hardship was substantial, with 35.9% earning below $25,000 annually and 61.9% delaying medical care due to cost. Chicago-area CHWs present a mixed but concerning health profile marked by significant mental health burden and economic precarity, underscoring the need for targeted employer and policy investments to sustain this essential workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.