ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Breaking numbers apart: The role of digit separators in magnitude perception.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digit separators are widely used in Hindu-Arabic numbers to group digits into readable triads, yet their influence on multi-digit number processing has been rarely studied. We examined whether digit separators affect how large numbers (millions or greater) are processed, beyond the effect of number length. In two experiments, participants compared pairs of large multi-digit numbers presented with or without digit separators between groups. The numbers differed in their leftmost digit, numeric scale (i.e., number length), or both, yielding four left-digit-scale compatibility conditions: compatible (e.g., 5,000,000,000 vs. 2,000,000), incompatible (e.g., 2,000,000,000 vs. 5,000,000), same left-digit (e.g., 2,000,000,000 vs. 2,000,000), and same scale (e.g., 5,000,000 vs. 2,000,000). In Experiment 1, participants selected the numerically larger number; in Experiment 2, they judged which number was longer, or whether both were equal in length. In Experiment 1, the presence of digit separators slowed responses, contrary to the expectation that it would facilitate processing. In both experiments, participants showed sensitivity to leftmost digit values: when the leftmost digit and numeric scale pointed to different responses (incompatible condition), responses were slower than when they agreed (compatible condition), producing a left-digit-scale compatibility effect. In Experiment 2, where digit values were task-irrelevant, the left-digit-scale compatibility effect emerged only in the presence of digit separators. These findings demonstrate that digit separators activate semantic processing of digit values, even when visual appearance alone could guide the task, revealing that syntactic formatting actively shapes numerical magnitude perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.