Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573888›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2026

Circulating microRNAs: a new era in early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Roshan Mustafa Pathan, Umadevi Subramanian, Jugraj Singh, Venkata Chandana Heshma Anumalasetty, Mukesh Ram Kumar Kommu, Vamsi Krishna Kondepati, Ponni Gayatri Twinkle Bade

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roshan Mustafa Pathan *Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, India. roshansmc921k@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5132-1545
Umadevi Subramanian *Centre for Research Impact and Outcome (CRiO), Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-1703
Jugraj SinghVerde Valley Medical Centre, Arizona, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1566-2609
Venkata Chandana Heshma AnumalasettyDr. P.S.I Medical College, Gannavaram, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6831-1358
Mukesh Ram Kumar KommuRangaraya Medical College, Kākināda, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4850-0595
Vamsi Krishna KondepatiGovernment Medical College, Ongole, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1677-3107
Ponni Gayatri Twinkle BadeKonaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Amalapuram, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7555-4365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chances of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) being diagnosed at an early stage are very low, and this leads to a poor prognosis. The presence of circulating miRNAs (miRNAs) in blood or saliva is now a potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarker, although the diagnostic accuracy of the studies reported remains vastly different due to differences in biofluids, miRNA panels, disease spectrum, and platforms.

methodsWe did a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA-DTA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251274288). Articles that evaluated circulating miRNAs in any biofluid in diagnosing OSCC were taken into consideration. A Bayesian bivariate random-effects model was used to pool together the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves. Heterogeneity sources were analyzed using pre-constructed subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

resultsThe number of studies that were evaluated in totality was seventeen and seven were incorporated in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the circulating miRNAs towards the detection of OSCC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75-0.95). It had a pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 7.25 (95% CI: 3.42-16.08), a negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.13(95% CI: 0.05-0.27), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 59.69(95%CI:14.33-209.95). Good performance in discriminating was also noted in the sROC curve with an area under the curve value of approximately 0.90. However, substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed (τ ≈ 0.93 for sensitivity; τ ≈ 0.83 for specificity), and the 95% credible intervals around the DOR were wide (14.33-209.95). Individual studies of multi-miRNA panels reported AUCs up to 0.98, though pooled subgroup estimates were limited by small study numbers and wide uncertainty.

conclusionsCirculating miRNAs and in particular multi-miRNA saliva-based profiles provide promising but heterogenous diagnostic accuracy for OSCC. While individual panel studies have reported high AUCs, the current pooled evidence-derived from only seven small, mostly case-control studies of advanced-stage disease-does not yet establish utility for true early detection or population screening.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCirculating MicroRNAEarly Detection of CancerMouth NeoplasmsHumansROC CurveSalivaSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNACirculating microRNA (miRNA)Diagnostic biomarkersEarly cancer detectionLiquid biopsyOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)

Identifiers

PMID42573888
PMCPMC13457530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.