ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
The Experience of General Internal Medicine Research Fellows and Program Directors: Results from a National Survey.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral medicine (GM) research fellowships facilitate health care professionals to obtain the skills and mentored research experience needed for a research career. Yet, little is known about the experience and outcomes of recent graduates of GM fellowships.
objectiveTo survey (1) GM research fellows and recent graduates and (2) program directors to learn about the opportunities and challenges facing GM research fellowships.
designCross-sectional retrospective survey study.
participantsIndividuals who were enrolled in or completed a GM research fellowship (identified through prior fellow lists, advertising from the Society of General Internal Medicine, and fellowship program directors) between 2012 and 2022 in which ≥ 50% of effort was devoted to training and conducting research; 2022 program directors were recruited separately. MAIN MEASURES: Respondents were asked to rate factors motivating them to pursue a research fellowship and their experiences during fellowship and to report their professional outcomes. Program directors were asked to rate how challenging different fellowship activities were to them. KEY
resultsA total of 160 (42.2%) current/former fellows and 27 (67.5%) program directors completed surveys. Fellowship training was considered essential to obtain the skills necessary to become a GM researcher. Fellows were highly productive (median of 4 papers [IQR 3-6] published from fellowship work); the majority obtained research faculty positions. Gaps in training included negotiation skills, team management, and grant writing. Trainees and graduates sought more cross-institutional collaboration during fellowship. Approximately 1/3 reported at least one symptom of burnout. Fellowship outcomes generally did not vary by gender or under-represented in medicine status. Program directors (88%) found fellowship recruitment challenging.
conclusionsResearch fellowships play a critical role in cultivating GM investigators. Consistent investment in GM research fellowships is needed to ensure a pipeline of researchers with the skills necessary to improve general medicine, especially during an ongoing crisis in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.