ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
The Promises and Pitfalls of Real-time Benefit Tools: A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReal-time benefit tools (RTBTs) are federally mandated clinician-facing applications embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) that display the out-of-pocket costs of prescribed medications and lower-cost alternatives, if available. RTBTs may be useful for primary care providers (PCPs), whose patients often take numerous medications; however, RTBTs may also add time to visits that are already complex and compressed.
objectiveTo explore PCP experiences with and attitudes toward RTBTs.
designWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study of PCPs with access to an RTBT at primary care clinics affiliated with two large academic health systems. Semi-structured interviews elicited (1) attitudes toward medication cost transparency, (2) RTBT training, (3) experiences using RTBTs, and (4) perceived effects of RTBT use on decision-making and administrative burden.
participantsPrimary care physicians and advance practice providers with ≥ 1 year of practice. MEASUREMENTS: Thematic analysis of interview transcripts.
resultsWe interviewed 35 PCPs. Most were physicians (25/35) and female (23/35), and had ≥ 10 years' experience (19/35). We identified three themes. First, PCPs received minimal education on RTBTs and were open to more training. Second, PCPs believe RTBTs have the potential to improve patient care by facilitating cost conversations and reducing administrative burden. Third, several pitfalls have hindered use, including incomplete information, inaccurate cost estimates, and clinically inappropriate lower-cost suggestions. LIMITATIONS: Two study sites, both of which use the same EHR.
conclusionWhile PCPs generally saw the RTBT as a promising tool that can facilitate compassionate, cost-conscious care, they identified problems that limited their desire to use it. For utilization to improve, EHR developers and insurers must ensure that RTBT information is actionable, clinically appropriate, and time saving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.