Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573855›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

Comparative Analysis of Lesion Detection and Uptake Characteristics of

Ebuzer Kalender, Edanur Eki̇nci̇ Yildirim, Enes Yerdeş, Buket Eren Saribaş, Umut Elboğa, Ertan Şahi̇n, Vuslat Mumcu Çi̇men

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ebuzer KalenderFaculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Nuclear Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey. dr.ebuz@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8472-3174
Edanur Eki̇nci̇ YildirimNuclear Medicine, Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Training and Research Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-5816
Enes YerdeşFaculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Nuclear Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-2438
Buket Eren SaribaşFaculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Nuclear Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5142-7328
Umut ElboğaFaculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Nuclear Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3650-8258
Ertan Şahi̇nFaculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Nuclear Medicine, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3053-9133
Vuslat Mumcu Çi̇menNuclear Medicine, Gaziantep City Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5390-6940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare lesion detection and uptake characteristics of

methodsA total of 24 patients with histopathologically confirmed GC were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent

results

conclusion

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingQuinolinesRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective Studies68Ga-FAPIFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesQuinolinesRadiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET/CT68Ga-FAPI PET/CTCAFsGastric cancerMolecular imagingTBR

Identifiers

PMID42573855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.