ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
Multicenter Validation of Cerebellar Motor Learning Biomarker for Spinocerebellar Degenerations.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectively quantifying cerebellar motor dysfunction remains a challenge in clinical trials. The Adaptability Index, derived from the Prism Adaptation Test, evaluates motor learning but lacks multicenter validation. We aimed to validate the Adaptability Index as a robust biomarker across multiple hospitals and investigate its relationship with the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. We enrolled 74 patients with cerebellar degeneration across seven hospitals using a standardized touchscreen system. We analyzed the correlation between Adaptability Index and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia and evaluated inter-hospital robustness using Linear Mixed-effects Modeling. Consistency of Adaptability Index variance between distinct genotypes (Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 6 and type 31) was assessed using Levene's test and normalized standard deviations. The Adaptability Index correlated negatively with the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (r = - 0.364, p < 0.01). Notably, Linear Mixed-effects Modeling revealed negligible inter-hospital variance, confirming robustness against site-specific biases. Levene's test indicated consistent Adaptability Index variance across these genotypes (p = 0.41). However, the Adaptability Index exhibited higher resolution than the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in detecting phenotypic variability (larger normalized standard deviations), particularly in the Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 31 cohort, likely reflecting cerebellar motor learning capacity distinct from motor execution deficits. The Adaptability Index is a valid, genotype-stable, and site-independent biomarker of cerebellar motor learning. Its high resolution and robustness make it a promising objective endpoint for multicenter interventional trials targeting cerebellar dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.