ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Multimodal artificial intelligence for prostate cancer imaging: workflow-relevant fusion of mpMRI, PSMA PET, ultrasound, and clinical data for diagnosis, local staging, and treatment personalization.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer imaging is inherently multimodal, yet many AI tools remain single-modality and therefore misaligned with real-world abdominal/genitourinary radiology decision-making. PURPOSE: We review workflow-relevant multimodal AI methods that fuse mpMRI, PSMA PET, ultrasound (including TRUS and elastography), and clinical or pathology data for diagnosis, local staging, and treatment personalization. CONTENT: MRI-plus-clinical fusion improves csPCa triage beyond imaging-only baselines and supports practical risk-model implementations. MRI-TRUS fusion models demonstrate improved lesion localization for targeted biopsy compared with unimodal AI and standard radiologist MRI interpretation in multicenter settings. For local staging, multimodal strategies for extraprostatic extension prediction are supported by meta-analytic evidence and emerging PET/MRI- or PET/CT-plus-MRI approaches that can assist radiologists and inform nerve-sparing planning. For treatment personalization, multimodal models predict biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy and extend toward systemic endpoints using imaging fused with clinical variables or pathology-derived features.
conclusionThe most adoption-ready directions for Abdominal Radiology readers are modular multimodal systems that improve triage, guide biopsy targeting, and quantify local extension risk with transparent validation pathways and human-centered deployment design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.