ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Prognostic value of risk factors for ischaemic and major bleeding events in chronic coronary syndrome: a SWEDEHEART registry study.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimIn patients with chronic coronary syndrome, risk factors for ischaemic events and bleeding tend to overlap. However, the combined effects of these factors have scarcely been studied in contemporary real-world settings.
methodsAll patients in Sweden undergoing elective PCI for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006 and 2014 enrolled in the SWEDEHEART registry were included. Six risk factors (age ≥ 65 years, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, multivessel disease (MVD), prior bleeding, and prior acute myocardial infarction (AMI)) were assessed in relation to the risk of ischaemic (cardiovascular death/AMI/stroke) and major bleeding events.
resultsWe studied 24,051 patients, of whom 59% had ≥ 2 risk factors. During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 3604 (15.0%) patients experienced ischaemic events and 2076 (8.6%) experienced major bleeding events . Higher numbers of risk factors were associated with a stepwise increase in the incidence of both ischaemic and bleeding events, being more substantial for ischaemic compared to bleeding events. In adjusted Cox models, prior bleeding was of less importance as compared to other risk factors for new ischaemic events. For bleeding events, diabetes, MVD, and prior AMI had limited relevance compared with other risk factors. When excluding patients with prior major bleeding, the increase in ischaemic risk with an increasing number of risk factors was more pronounced, whereas the increase in bleeding incidence was attenuated. .
conclusionsAmong patients with angiographically confirmed chronic coronary syndrome, the majority had two or more established risk factors. An increasing number of risk factors was associated with a higher rate of ischaemic and bleeding events, being more substantial for ischaemic compared to bleeding events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.