ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Multidimensional Experimental Characterization of Lumbar Spinal Deformity.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpinal deformities and motions of the spinal joints are rarely confined to a single anatomical plane. Yet diagnosis of such deformities and characterizations of their biomechanical behavior under load are often limited to two-dimensional methods of analysis. This study presented a testing methodology and visualization method to characterize the biomechanical responses of the intact and deformed lumbar spine under combined loading in multiple dimensions simultaneously.
methodsTwo L1-L5 lumbar spinal specimens underwent loading by five custom trajectories (rays, clockwise and counterclockwise petals and circles), each intended to perturb different responses of the spinal joints within the same range of motion.
resultsMultidimensional loading highlighted differing regions of spinal stiffness between intact and deformed specimens that do not fall along the sagittal and coronal planes. The rays trajectory crucially captured the non-linear, hysteretic behavior of planar loading and unloading patterns of the spine but also suggested a potentially misleading isotropy of spinal behavior relative to the craniocaudal axis. The petals and circles trajectories appropriately capture the anisotropy of spinal bending between the sagittal and coronal planes. The clockwise and counterclockwise versions of these trajectories emphasize how deformity impacts this anisotropy in both the neutral and elastic zones.
conclusionThe insights from these trajectories highlight nuances of biomechanical behavior of the lumbar spine and disruptions due to deformity that would not be captured by pure moment loading alone. Introducing multidimensional characterization of biomechanical differences holds promise to supplement future clinical considerations for treatment of spinal deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.