ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
CONRep: Uncertainty-Aware Vision-Language Report Drafting Using Conformal Prediction.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to quantify uncertainty in vision-language model (VLM)-based automated radiology report drafting (ARRD) to support trustworthy clinical deployment. In this study, we developed CONRep in two settings: label-based and sentence-based. In the label-based pipeline, we used the ChestX-Det10 dataset, comprising 3001 chest radiographs with radiologist annotations for ten thoracic pathologies. Two VLM paradigms were evaluated for classification, and conformal prediction (CP) was applied to stratify outputs into certain (high-confidence) and uncertain (low-confidence) subgroups at three significance levels (α = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2). Classification performance was compared between subgroups using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In the sentence-based pipeline, experiments were conducted on the Open-I chest X-ray dataset (3660 cases), using radiologist-written impression sections as ground-truth (GT). A decoder-only VLM generated impression texts, and CP was applied to categorize outputs as certain or uncertain/highly uncertain subgroups. Semantic alignment between generated and GT impressions was quantified using cosine similarity computed with a contrastive VLM and compared between subgroups. Additionally, an independent large language model (LLM) was used to score semantic agreement between generated and GT impressions and to judge clinical concordance, providing an evaluation independent of the scoring embedding. Across both pipelines, outputs classified as certain demonstrated significantly higher agreement with GT than uncertain outputs. In the label-based experiments, the certain subset achieved significantly higher AUROCs across multiple findings (P < 0.05). In the sentence-based experiments, certain cases showed significantly greater semantic similarity between generated and reference impressions (P < 0.001). This was corroborated by the independent LLM evaluator, which assigned significantly higher agreement scores and match rates to certain cases than to uncertain/highly uncertain cases (P < 0.001). CONRep provides a model-agnostic framework for uncertainty-aware ARRD using CP. By quantifying predictive uncertainty, CONRep enhances the transparency, reliability, and clinical usability of VLM-based ARRD systems, supporting safer integration into radiology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.