Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573678›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2026

Do surgical technique and pin configuration influence clinical and radiological outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures? a modified Flynn-based analysis.

R Arıkan, K Öner, F Karaca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R ArıkanBayburt State Hospital, Bayburt, Turkey.
K ÖnerKaradeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
F KaracaKaradeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. karacafaruk1996@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-096X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are among the most common elbow injuries in childhood. Although K-wire fixation is widely accepted, the optimal surgical technique and pin configuration remain controversial. Additionally, the Modified Flynn criteria, which assess both functional and cosmetic outcomes, have been less frequently utilized in the literature.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate whether surgical technique and pin configuration influence clinical and radiological outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using Modified Flynn criteria.

methodsThis retrospective study included 78 pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for supracondylar humerus fractures between 2012 and 2021. Patients were categorized according to surgical technique (open vs. closed reduction) and pin configuration (lateral-only vs. medial-lateral fixation). Radiological parameters, including Baumann angle, carrying angle, and humerocapitellar angle, were assessed. Functional and cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using the Modified Flynn criteria. Range of motion was compared with the contralateral side. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

resultsClosed reduction was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay compared to open reduction (p < 0.001). Gartland type II fractures demonstrated significantly shorter pin removal times than type III and IV fractures (p = 0.036). No significant differences were observed between surgical techniques or pin configurations in terms of radiological parameters or Modified Flynn functional and cosmetic outcomes (p > 0.05). According to the Modified Flynn cosmetic score, carrying angle and supination differed significantly between excellent and good outcome groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Based on the Modified Flynn functional score, flexion-extension arc and supination were significantly different between excellent-good and fair-poor outcome groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). All observed nerve injuries resolved during follow-up, consistent with neuropraxia.

conclusionNo significant differences were observed between lateral-only and crossed pin fixation regarding clinical, radiological, or Modified Flynn outcomes in this retrospective study. Both fixation methods provided satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes when stable fracture reduction was achieved. These findings suggest that the choice of pin configuration should be individualized according to fracture characteristics and intraoperative stability rather than applied routinely. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Closed reductionK-wireModified Flynn criteriaOpen reductionPediatric fracturePin configurationSupracondylar humerus fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.