Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573650›Full record

ReviewBiodegradation2026

Microalgae-mediated removal and biodegradation of indoor volatile organic compounds: mechanisms, performance metrics, and engineering constraints.

Na Li, Can Wang, Jin Zhang, Jing Zhang, Yuanfan Zhao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Na LiAnhui Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Can WangEngineering Research Center of Building Energy Efficiency Control and Evaluation, Ministry of Education, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China. wangcan@ahjzu.edu.cn.
Jin ZhangAnhui Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Jing ZhangAnhui Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Yuanfan ZhaoAnhui Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, 230601, China.

Funding

Anhui New Era Education Quality Project, China 2024cxcysj146Anhui Provincial Housing and Urban-Rural Development Science and Technology Plan Projects 2024-YF056Joint Training Program between Higher Education Institutions, Research Organizations and Enterprises in Anhui Province HYB20240256National Natural Science Foundation of China 42402038Open Project Program of Engineering Research Center of Building Energy Efficiency Control and Evaluation, Ministry of Education, China AHJZNX-2024-10University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province 2024AH050250Youth Teacher Training Initiative Project of the Department of Education of Anhui Province JNFX2023023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) require treatment technologies that remain effective at low concentrations and high airflow rates without generating persistent secondary waste. This structured narrative review evaluates VOC removal by microalgae and algal-bacterial consortia using an evidence hierarchy that distinguishes direct gas-phase studies, gas-liquid reactor studies, and aqueous mechanistic studies. Formaldehyde and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) are identified as the principal indoor VOC targets, whereas studies on phenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and other aqueous organic contaminants are considered mainly as mechanistic evidence. Direct evidence at indoor-relevant gas-phase concentrations remains scarce, and removal efficiencies obtained from liquid batch cultures cannot be extrapolated to indoor air without considering gas-liquid partitioning, biomass loading, reactor configuration, airflow, and abiotic losses. Quantitative comparison is further limited by inconsistent units, inadequate controls, incomplete carbon balances, and insufficient data on energy demand, byproducts, long-term stability, and bioaerosol containment. Future studies should therefore report standardized performance indicators and verify mineralization through mass-balance or isotope-based approaches. Current evidence supports microalgal systems primarily as application-specific biological polishing processes rather than established replacements for conventional air-cleaning technologies.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorMicroalgaeVolatile Organic CompoundsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalAir PollutantsVolatile Organic CompoundsAlgal–bacterial consortiaGas–liquid mass transferHVAC integrationIndoor volatile organic compoundsMicroalgaePerformance normalizationPhotobioreactors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.