ReviewBiodegradation2026
Microalgae-mediated removal and biodegradation of indoor volatile organic compounds: mechanisms, performance metrics, and engineering constraints.
Review in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Indoor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) require treatment technologies that remain effective at low concentrations and high airflow rates without generating persistent secondary waste. This structured narrative review evaluates VOC removal by microalgae and algal-bacterial consortia using an evidence hierarchy that distinguishes direct gas-phase studies, gas-liquid reactor studies, and aqueous mechanistic studies. Formaldehyde and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) are identified as the principal indoor VOC targets, whereas studies on phenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and other aqueous organic contaminants are considered mainly as mechanistic evidence. Direct evidence at indoor-relevant gas-phase concentrations remains scarce, and removal efficiencies obtained from liquid batch cultures cannot be extrapolated to indoor air without considering gas-liquid partitioning, biomass loading, reactor configuration, airflow, and abiotic losses. Quantitative comparison is further limited by inconsistent units, inadequate controls, incomplete carbon balances, and insufficient data on energy demand, byproducts, long-term stability, and bioaerosol containment. Future studies should therefore report standardized performance indicators and verify mineralization through mass-balance or isotope-based approaches. Current evidence supports microalgal systems primarily as application-specific biological polishing processes rather than established replacements for conventional air-cleaning technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.