Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573647›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Size and solvent effects on cellulose transverse anisotropy and toughening design.

Xu Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xu DongDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, 310027, Hangzhou, China. donx@zuaa.zju.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8396-1812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are a promising class of materials derived from the most abundant natural polymer resource on Earth. Hydroxyl-induced polarity is a crucial advantage of CNCs, making them promising for advanced design and applications. Side chain hydroxyls, hydrogen bonds, and particular crystal structures of CNCs lead to unique anisotropy. However, the nuanced anisotropy in the transverse section is not sufficiently stressed and cannot be precisely described experimentally. Although partially covered by previous studies, a quantitative explanation of size dependency and a systematic comparison of solvent influences are still lacking. The manufacturing of cellulose materials requires a better understanding of anisotropy, size dependency, and solvent influences. In this study, the anisotropic performance of CNCs in specific directions and a diverse array of solvent environments was carefully inspected and compared using molecular simulations. Furthermore, a data-supported explanation for the size dependency and transverse arrangement toughness-enhanced designs were both proposed. These systematic comparisons and unique transverse arrangements could aid future applications of cellulose.

methodsThis study employed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using the GROMACS software alongside the CHARMM36 force field, with force field files generated via CHARMM-GUI tools. To overcome the challenge of applying shear loads in MD, the models corresponding to the characteristic directions were constructed and subjected to cell deformation at a constant velocity. All simulations were conducted under the NPT ensemble at 0.1 MPa. The reliability of the observed anisotropy and fracture behaviors was confirmed via replica simulations at stretching velocities ranging from 0.1 to 40.0 nm/ns. Finally, explicit solvent models were utilized to evaluate solvent exposure effects.

Indexed as

AnisotropyCelluloseHydrogen bondsStructure designStructure optimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.