ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open excision of choledochal cyst in preschool-aged children: analysis from a nationally representative database.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts (CC) in young children is a technically demanding procedure, and comparative outcomes with open surgery remain incompletely defined. This study aims to compare outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) in children ≤ 5 years.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database to identify children with CC who underwent definitive surgical excision between 2015 and 2025. Patients were grouped by operative approach (LS vs. OS). Demographic characteristics, operative techniques, and postoperative outcomes were compared.
resultsA total of 533 children were included (LS: 251, 47.1%; OS: 282, 52.9%). LS was more often performed during elective admissions (p < 0.001) and in older children (p < 0.001). Preoperative malnutrition (p = 0.032), cholangitis (p = 0.029), and the need for drainage procedures prior to definitive surgery (p = 0.050) were more common in OS. Hepaticoduodenostomy predominated in LS, while hepaticojejunostomy was more common with OS (p < 0.001). There were no differences in overall 90-day postoperative complications (p = 0.618). LS was associated with fewer blood transfusions (p = 0.049), total parenteral nutrition (p = 0.005), and mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001), decreased odds of intensive care unit admission (p < 0.001), and shorter length of stay (p < 0.001). At 90-day follow-up, biliary calculi were more common after LS (2.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.029), while hepatic fibrosis was observed only after OS (3.5%, p = 0.002).
conclusionIn preschool-aged children with choledochal cysts, laparoscopic and open approaches demonstrate similar short-term complication rates. Laparoscopy is associated with improved perioperative recovery and reduced resource utilization. When patient and disease factors permit, LS represents a reasonable primary operative approach, although careful patient selection remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42573628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.