ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026
Variations in general practitioners' referrals to low-value MRI examinations in Norway: A nationwide register-based study.
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge variations in diagnostic imaging use raise concerns about low-value care, inequity, and inefficient use of resources. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head, lumbosacral spine, and knee has been identified as potentially low-value examinations in several clinical contexts.
objectivesTo examine variation in general practitioners' referrals to low-value MRI examinations in Norway and assess whether differences are associated with GP and practice characteristics.
methodsUsing national registry data, we linked patients' completed MRI examinations to their regular GP and calculated GP-specific MRI rates per 1000 listed patients. We classified GPs into deciles and compared the characteristics of GPs in the highest (High-10) and lowest (Low-10) referral deciles. We examined predictors of variation using pooled OLS regression models with year fixed effects and GP-clustered standard errors.
resultsGPs in the top referring decile (High-10) referred patients for potentially low-value MRI examinations at three times the rate of those in the lowest referring decile (Low-10). Experienced (specialist-certified) GPs referred approximately 2.7 fewer examinations per 1000 listed patients per year than less experienced GPs (non-specialists). Shorter consultation times, higher consultation frequency and higher hourly fee income were all associated with higher MRI use - with the strongest association for private MRI. A higher patient disease burden was associated with more total examination, but fewer private examinations per 1000 listed patients per year.
conclusionReferral rates varied markedly between GPs. Specialist-certified GPs had lower rates than non-specialists, and higher activity levels and income from fees were associated with higher referral rates - particularly to private providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.