Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573609›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Predictive value of blood eosinophil count and serum total immunoglobulin E for type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis according to allergic sensitization status.

Ara Cho, Hyung-Ju Cho, Chang-Hoon Kim, Kihyuck Kwak, Min-Seok Rha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ara ChoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-4883
Hyung-Ju ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-3225
Chang-Hoon KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-6396
Kihyuck KwakDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-9589
Min-Seok RhaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. msrha@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1426-7534

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2025-00516950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of blood eosinophil count (BEC) and serum total IgE for type 2 (T2) chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to determine whether their performance is affected by allergic sensitization or other patient characteristics.

methodsData from 177 patients with CRS who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery were analyzed. T2 CRS was defined as tissue eosinophil count (TEC) ≥ 10 eosinophils/high-power field. Correlations between BEC, blood eosinophil percentage (BEP), serum total IgE, and TEC were assessed. The diagnostic performance for T2 CRS was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were divided into allergic and non-allergic groups according to allergic sensitization, and subgroup analyses were conducted.

resultsBEC and BEP, but not serum total IgE, were positively correlated with TEC, regardless of allergic sensitization. Consistently, the area under the curve (AUC) values for BEC in ROC analyses were comparable across the total cohort and the allergic and non-allergic groups and remained stable across different histologic definitions of T2 CRS. Serum total IgE exhibited significantly lower AUC values than BEC, with values generally lower in the non-allergic group. Youden index-based optimal cutoff values for BEC clustered around 220-230/µL, exceeding the conventional threshold of 150/µL.

conclusionThe findings support the use of BEC as a preferred surrogate marker for tissue eosinophilia-defined T2 CRS regardless of allergic sensitization, and suggest that a modest upward revision of the BEC cutoff may be warranted. Serum total IgE demonstrated limited diagnostic value for tissue eosinophilia-defined T2 CRS, particularly in the non-allergic group.

Indexed as

Allergic sensitizationBlood eosinophilChronic rhinosinusitisEndotypeTotal IgE

Identifiers

PMID42573609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.