ArticleMedical physics2026
Development of an online neutron beam monitoring method for accelerator-based BNCT using an 8-MeV proton-beryllium source.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has emerged as a promising cell-selective clinical treatment for recurrent glioblastoma as well as head and neck cancers. In recent years, BNCT has been implemented in several hospitals using accelerator-based neutron sources. However, direct online measurement of the incident neutron beam intensity during clinical BNCT remains a major challenge. Neutron dosimetry is typically inferred from the accumulated electric charge of the incident proton beam delivered to the beryllium neutron-production target. PURPOSE: To improve the reliability of neutron beam control, it is essential to implement an online neutron-monitoring system that complements proton beam current measurements. Such a system enables precise real-time regulation of the neutron dose delivered to patients. In this study, we developed a new online neutron-beam monitoring technique capable of measuring the neutron beam intensity in real time.
methodsReliable monitoring of neutron intensity at the patient position was achieved by detecting fast neutrons. The fast-neutron detector consisted of a silicon diode coupled with a high-density polyethylene neutron converter. The spatial distribution of neutrons was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations to determine the optimal placement of the neutron beam monitor. The proposed method was validated through gold-activation analysis, cell irradiation experiments, and accelerator tuning.
resultsOnline neutron-beam monitoring was successfully achieved by detecting fast neutrons at the end of the vacuum beam duct, where neutrons propagate directly without traversing radiation shielding. The neutron counting rate increased immediately at the onset of proton-beam irradiation and decreased upon its termination, exhibiting periodic fluctuations throughout the irradiation period. These fluctuations did not significantly affect the integrated neutron counts, as they were averaged over a typical BNCT irradiation time of approximately 30 min. The fast-neutron detector produced a mean counting rate of 124.6 counts per mC of incident proton-beam charge, with a relative standard deviation of 1.2%, and yielded a neutron-calibration factor of
conclusionThe online neutron-beam monitoring technique using a fast-neutron detector demonstrated high reproducibility, as the neutron counting rates remained stable regardless of the irradiation phantom placed downstream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.