ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Harnessing Li-Ion Binding Energy for Solvation-Guided Electrolyte Additive Design and Robust Solid Electrolyte Interphase Reinforcement.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rational design of electrolyte systems is essential for stabilizing the electrode-electrolyte interface to enhance the electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Although conventional strategies focus on the introduction of specific functional moieties, the correlation between the molecular structure of an electrolyte additive and the extent of effective localized enrichment at the interface remains poorly understood. Herein, we propose a solvation-guided additive design strategy in which the Li-ion binding energy of the additive serves as a factor for effective solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) reinforcement. This hypothesis is validated by employing a σ-bonding-insulation-based model system, which contains allyl methyl sulfone (AMS), allyl methyl carbonate (AMC), and allyl methyl ether (AME) as electrolyte additives with varying Li-ion binding affinities. Computational simulations and spectroscopic analyses confirmed that AMS, which has the highest binding energy, preferentially participates in the Li-ion solvation shell. This affinity, which facilitates the spontaneous migration of the additive toward the negative electrode during the SEI formation step, results in the development of a robust SEI layer concentrated at the negative electrode. These findings highlight the importance of interactions between Li-ions and additives in interface engineering and provide a systematic framework for the development of high-performance electrolyte additives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.