Trial reportResearch in nursing & health2026
Feasibility and Exploratory Outcomes of Foot-Ankle and Walking Exercises for Diabetic Neuropathy, Stress, and Quality of Life: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foot-ankle and walking exercises have been proposed as potential strategies for managing symptoms in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), yet evidence from primary care remains limited. This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of these interventions and explored preliminary outcome patterns in DPN, stress, and quality of life (QoL). A three-arm pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in three public health centers in Yogyakarta, Indonesia (n = 108; 36 per group). The control group received usual care and health education. The foot-ankle group received education, leaflets, demonstrations, and guided practice, while the walking group received education and leaflets supporting a structured walking routine. Participants in the intervention groups then performed the exercises independently for 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. Feasibility included recruitment, retention, data completeness, adherence, and adverse events. Adherence to the ≥ 150 min/week activity target was assessed using participant-reported exercise logs. Acceptability was explored through open-ended questions. Exploratory outcomes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations under an intention-to-treat approach. Feasibility indicators were favorable, with retention > 90%, minimal adverse events, and ≥ 80% adherence. Exploratory analyses suggested possible trends toward changes in DPN indicators, diabetes-related distress, QoL barriers, fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, and ankle-brachial index in the intervention groups compared with controls. These findings suggest that the interventions are feasible and acceptable in primary care and provide preliminary estimates to inform a future fully powered randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.