Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42573341›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026

Spotted fever

B R Ansil, Tejas Pawar, Pallab Majee, Rridhi Kapila, Tikily Libang, Uma Ramakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B R AnsilNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9787-4569
Tejas PawarNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pallab MajeeNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rridhi KapilaNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Tikily LibangNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Uma RamakrishnanNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-5966

Funding

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India RTI 4006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial zoonoses constitute a significant proportion of emerging infectious diseases. Yet, the diversity and transmission cycles of many zoonotic bacteria remain poorly characterized, particularly in tropical, biodiverse regions where host and vector diversity are high, and the burden of zoonotic disease in human populations is substantial. In this study, we investigated the presence of five pathogenic bacterial genera- IMPORTANCE: Many bacterial infections affecting humans originate in wild and synanthropic rodents, making it essential to characterize bacterial diversity in these hosts to predict and mitigate zoonotic risk. This study provides a molecular assessment of five pathogenic bacterial genera, including

Indexed as

BorreliaRelapsing FeverRickettsiaRodentiaSpotted Fever Group RickettsiosisAnimalsBacterial ZoonosesHumansIndiaLeptospiraPhylogenyRatsZoonosescoinfectionCoxiellaLeptospiraOrientiavector-borne pathogenszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42573341
PMCPMC13532344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.