ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Crystalline Lens Tilts Less With Higher Myopia in Children With Limited Age-Related Effect.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate tilted crystalline lens morphology in children across different orientations and their correlations with age and spherical equivalent (SE). Methods: This cross-sectional study encompassed 966 eyes of 493 children (5-15 years; SE, -6.00 to +3.00 diopters [D]). The binocular crystalline lens biometrics in 16 orientations were measured using swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Parameters included the anterior radius of the lens (LAR), posterior radius of the lens (LPR), thickness, and diameter, as well as lens tilt and decentration. Group comparisons were performed among non-, low-, and moderate-myopic eyes. Results: Lens tilt and decentration demonstrated semi-periodic variations (R2 = 0.984 and R2 = 0.789, respectively). Lenses predominantly tilted temporal-inferiorly, with corresponding temporal decentration. The non-myopia group had significantly higher LAR and LPR (more curved) than the low- and moderate-myopia groups (all P < 0.001). As myopia increased, lens tilt consistently decreased across all refractive subgroups (all P < 0.001), whereas other parameters either reached a turning point at approximately -4.00 D or showed no linearity. Age-stratified polynomial analysis revealed that the positive correlation between lens tilt and SE remained strong within the range of -4.18 D to +3.00 D. Conclusions: Although the lens maintains a greater tilt toward the temporal and inferior regions, it exhibits less tilt and becomes more orthotopic in eyes with higher myopia across different age groups in children. Translational Relevance: This study established crystalline lens tilt as a robust, less age-dependent biomarker that could enhance the prediction of myopia progression and facilitate individualized risk assessment in pediatric refractive development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.