ArticleEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2026
Agreement Between Standard and Right Ventricular-Focused Apical Four-Chamber Views for Right Ventricular Longitudinal Functional Indices: A Within-Participant Agreement Study.
Article in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether right ventricular (RV) longitudinal functional indices measured from standard and RV-focused apical four-chamber (A4C) views are interchangeable at the individual level.
methodsWe conducted a secondary cross-sectional agreement analysis of anonymized echocardiographic data acquired in Dalian, China, from January 2021-January 2022. The primary analysis included 115 of 120 screened adults after prespecified eligibility and audit-stage exclusions; sensitivity analyses retained all 120. Paired measurements comprised tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), lateral tricuspid annular S', e', and a' velocities, and tissue motion annular displacement (TMAD)-derived indices. Observer reproducibility was evaluated in 30 cases.
resultsTAPSE was similar between standard and RV-focused views (22.4 ± 3.6 vs 22.4 ± 3.2 mm; mean difference, -0.09 mm; p = 0.805), and other group-level differences were small. Individual agreement was limited: intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.40 for TAPSE, 0.45-0.65 for tissue Doppler velocities, and 0.39-0.68 for TMAD indices. Sensitivity-analysis ICCs remained poor to moderate (0.21-0.65). Intraobserver and interobserver ICCs in the 30-case subset were 0.97-1.00 and 0.94-0.99, respectively.
conclusionStandard and RV-focused A4C views produced similar group means but only poor-to-moderate individual agreement. The acquisition view should be kept consistent and documented in serial reports and research datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.