ArticleEndocrine-related cancer2026
Expert consensus on the reporting and clinical follow up of individuals with incidentally discovered germline RET variants in the UK.
Article in Endocrine-related cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incidentally discovered pathogenic germline genetic variants refer to the finding of a pathogenic variant in a gene that is unrelated to the reason for the initial test and is not actively sought. Our clinical understanding of the risk of developing a particular medical condition and the required clinical action for a specific pathogenic gene variant is predominantly based on knowledge and information acquired from cases ascertained through a 'phenotype-first approach' rather than in clinically unselected individuals. Therefore, a modified approach is required for incidentally discovered gene variants. Data from large UK and US population-based cohorts have demonstrated that RET variants classified as moderate-risk RET variants as per the American Thyroid Association (ATA) classification have a low penetrance for medullary thyroid cancer and other RET-related conditions (e.g. phaeochromocytoma) and are not associated with excess mortality when identified incidentally in clinically unselected adult individuals. Here, we provide guidance based on multidisciplinary expert consensus opinion for the reporting and subsequent clinical surveillance and management of patients with incidentally discovered RET gene variants in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.