ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2026
Assessment of Early Warning Systems for Emergencies and Disasters in Hospitals of Mazandaran, Iran, in 2024: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the status of early warning systems (EWS) for disaster and emergency response in hospitals affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2024. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted from April to December 2024 across all affiliated hospitals with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Data were collected using a validated 55-item EWS checklist evaluating preparedness in both pre-incident and during-incident phases. Overall hospital preparedness was categorized as good (≥75%), moderate (50-74%), or poor (<50%). Results: In the pre-incident phase, 28 out of 32 hospitals (87.5%) demonstrated good preparedness score (mean±SD: 74.8±12.1). During the incident phase, overall preparedness declined, with only 25 hospitals (78.1%) classified as good (mean±SD: 61.7±14.9). Based on total performance scores, Hospital No. 29 and 30 ranked the highest, while Hospital No. 4 demonstrated the weakest overall preparedness across both phases. Conclusion: While most hospitals exhibited adequate preparedness in key EWS components, such as warning dissemination and response readiness, notable weaknesses were identified in hazard identification, hazard monitoring, and documentation. Strengthening targeted training programs, establishing integrated monitoring systems, and conducting regular simulation exercises are essential for enhancing operational effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.