ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Bilateral Ocular ischemia in a patient with Takayasu arteritis.
Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe a rare case of bilateral ocular ischemia as the initial presentation of Takayasu arteritis and highlight the role of early recognition and treatment in preventing irreversible vision loss. Methods: A woman in her 50s presented with a gradual, progressive diminution of vision, initially in the left eye and later involving the right. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, systemic examination, fundus fluorescein angiography, and CT angiography of the head and neck were performed. Laboratory investigations, including ESR, CRP, and ANA, were obtained. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were applied to support the diagnosis. Results: The patient demonstrated severe ocular ischemic features, including attenuated retinal vessels, disc neovascularization, and intumescent cataract in the left eye. Systemic examination revealed feeble brachial and radial pulses with a significant inter-arm blood pressure difference. CT angiography showed narrowing of the right common carotid artery and non-opacification of both subclavian arteries. Laboratory findings revealed elevated ESR and CRP, with a positive ANA. Based on clinical, radiologic, and laboratory features, a diagnosis of bilateral ocular ischemia secondary to Takayasu arteritis was made. The patient was treated with oral corticosteroids (60 mg/day, tapered) and azathioprine. At 4 weeks, visual acuity improved to 6/36 in the right eye, while no improvement was noted in the left eye. Discussion: Our case highlights bilateral ocular ischemia as an uncommon but vision-threatening manifestation of Takayasu arteritis. Ocular findings such as retinal vascular attenuation, disc neovascularization, delayed choroidal filling, and peripheral capillary non-perfusion may precede the diagnosis of systemic vasculitis. Recognition of associated systemic signs, including pulse deficits and inter-arm blood pressure discrepancies, facilitated timely diagnosis. Prompt initiation of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy led to visual improvement in the right eye, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management to prevent irreversible visual loss and systemic vascular complications. Conclusion: Bilateral ocular ischemia may be the first manifestation of Takayasu arteritis. This case underscores the importance of a high index of suspicion in patients with unexplained ischemic ocular features. Early systemic evaluation and prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are essential to preserve vision and prevent further vascular complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.