Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42572678›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Determinants of family planning use among married women of reproductive age in south Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Syeda Kanza Naqvi, Laeba Hussain, Sameeta Kumari, Varisha Madni, Hajra Malik, Iqra Fatima Munawar, Priya Ashok Kumar, Ali Malik, Kinza Farooqui, Jai K Das and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Syeda Kanza NaqviInstitute for Global Health and Development (IGHD), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Laeba HussainDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sameeta KumariDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Varisha MadniMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hajra MalikDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Iqra Fatima MunawarMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Priya Ashok KumarMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ali MalikFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kinza FarooquiData and Digital, Vital Pakistan Trust, Karachi, Pakistan.
Jai K DasDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health and Institute for Global Health and Development (IGHD), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zahra HoodbhoyDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family Planning (FP) is central to reproductive autonomy; however, structural barriers and restrictive gender norms limit equitable access to modern contraceptive methods in South Asia. We aimed to synthesize the current evidence on determinants of modern contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age in South Asia. Methods: We searched Medline, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL from Findings: There were 78 studies with 2,212,823 study participants that met the inclusion criteria and 70 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Women's formal education and employment (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08-1.70, I Interpretation: Strengthening women's empowerment, increasing male engagement, and improving access of FP services are essential for equitable access of modern contraceptive methods across South Asia. Funding: This study was not funded by any individual or agency.

Indexed as

Contraceptive useFamily planningMarried women of reproductive ageMeta-analysisModern contraceptive useSouth AsiaUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID42572678
PMCPMC13453050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.