ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Documented Tobacco Cessation Care and Patient Outcomes in Malawi: Analysis of Post-Training Clinical Records.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare worker training programs for tobacco cessation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often evaluate isolated service indicators. Tobacco cessation care is inherently multi-component, yet the association between the breadth of documented care (as recorded in routine clinical records) and patient outcomes has rarely been examined in LMIC settings. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 640 patient assessments collected over nine months following a tobacco harm reduction and smoking cessation training program for frontline healthcare workers in Lilongwe and Mzimba North districts, Malawi. A documented-care index (0-4) was constructed by summing four binary indicators: tobacco-use screening, cessation counseling, prior quit attempt, and cessation service utilization. The index measures the extent to which these interventions were documented in clinical records, not independently verified care delivery. Multivariable linear regression identified predictors of index score. Logistic regression estimated associations between index score and two outcomes: improved tobacco-use status at follow-up and follow-up attendance. Dose-response patterns were assessed using Spearman rank correlation and chi-square tests. Results: Scores of 3 or 4 were observed in 70.9% of records. Daily tobacco use was the strongest predictor of higher index scores (β=1.08, p<0.001), followed by Mzimba North district (β=0.24, p=0.001) and older age (β=0.01, p=0.007). Among 261 follow-up assessments, improvement rates increased from 47.1% (index 0-1) to 76.6% (index 4). Each one-unit increase in index score was associated with nearly twice the odds of improvement (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43-2.92, p<0.001) and follow-up attendance (aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.78-2.70, p<0.001). A significant dose-response pattern was observed (Spearman Conclusion: Higher documented-care index scores were associated with better cessation-related outcomes and greater re-engagement in care. These findings are exploratory; the index has not yet been prospectively validated. Prospective validation with independently verified cessation outcomes is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.