ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2026
Feasibility and outcomes of catheter ablation using robotic magnetic navigation in patients with congenital heart disease with varying defect complexity.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) allows for catheter ablation in the presence of complex cardiac anatomy, such as that seen in congenital heart disease (CHD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this procedure in a wide range of CHD conditions. Methods: Patients with CHD who underwent catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias using RMN were included in this single-centre observational study. Patients' baseline characteristics, procedural data, periprocedural complications and acute success rates were obtained. The efficacy of the ablation was evaluated during follow-up in the outpatient clinic using 24-h Holter monitoring. Results: The study population consisted of 38 patients (26 males) with a median age of 36.8 (IQR 30.8-39.6) years. Surgically corrected transposition of the great arteries was the most common CHD, observed in 14 patients (36.8%). Nineteen patients (50.0%) had more than one congenital defect. Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia ablated, accounting for 21 procedures (55.3%).Median procedural time was 232.5 min (IQR 186.3-281.3); the median radiation dose and radiation time were 2.4 mGy m Conclusions: RMN is a valuable tool for catheter ablation of arrhythmias in patients with congenital heart disease and complex anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.