ArticlePeerJ2026
Analysis of pain intensity and quality of life in patients with lumbar disc disease treated with PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) and ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) interbody stabilization methods: a 3-month retrospective analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lumbar disc disease is one of the most common causes of spinal pain and represents a significant health problem. Surgical treatment often involves interbody stabilization, performed using Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) or Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) methods. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 112 patients (64 women, 48 men) with lumbar disc disease aged 17-72 years. Patients underwent PLIF (73 patients, 65.18%) or ALIF (39 patients, 34.82%) procedures. Pain assessment utilized the visual analogue scale (VAS) scale and numerical rating scale (NRS) for specific disc disease symptoms. Quality of life was measured using Cantril's ladder retrospectively before symptom onset, 3 months post-operation, and prospectively for predicted future (2-3 years). Robust linear regression models with interaction analysis were applied. Results: Significant pain reduction on the VAS scale was found after 3 months (average 6.07 points, Conclusions: Both PLIF and ALIF demonstrated substantial reductions in pain complaints and improvements in quality of life in patients with lumbar disc disease in 3-month follow-up. Both PLIF and ALIF demonstrated substantial pain reduction and quality of life improvement in 3-month follow-up. However, definitive recommendations for method selection require long-term studies with patient randomization and longer follow-up periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.