ArticleJHLT open2026
Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in pulmonary hypertension: Perioperative use and clinical considerations.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a hemodynamic and pathophysiologic condition associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients undergoing cardiac or high-risk non-cardiac surgery. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (iPVs) offer a targeted strategy to reduce pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and improve right ventricular (RV) function while minimizing systemic hypotension. Traditional vasodilators such as nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside lack pulmonary specificity and can exacerbate systemic hypotension. Inhaled agents including nitric oxide (NO), epoprostenol (iEPO), iloprost, milrinone (iMIL) and levosimendan provide selective pulmonary vasodilation with more favorable hemodynamic profiles. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and clinical considerations for the use of iPVs in the perioperative management of PH and discusses pharmacokinetics, delivery mechanisms, adverse effects, and logistical considerations for these agents. New emerging PH therapies are included based on early clinical trial data as they have the potential to impact perioperative care in the future. Overall, iPVs represent a valuable tool in the perioperative care of patients with PH. Continued research is needed to refine clinical protocols, evaluate emerging agents, and establish outcome-based evidence for their routine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.