Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42572521›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Evaluating an Algorithm for Prescribing Mildly Thick Liquids as a Temporary Bridge to an Oral Diet in the Acutely Hospitalized Population.

Melodyanne Cheng, Sarah Panjwani, Jennifer L Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melodyanne ChengOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Sarah PanjwaniOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Jennifer L LongSurgery and Perioperative Medicine, Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate the safety of the temporary use of mildly thick liquids (MTL) prescribed at bedside using a stringent algorithm in hospitalized patients.  Study design This retrospective chart review study included hospitalized patients who had a consultation with speech pathology for clinical swallow evaluation and were given diet recommendations of MTL. Exclusion criteria involved patients who were initially seen for an instrumental assessment (not at bedside) and patients who did not receive speech-language pathologist (SLP) follow-up (due to a change in medical status, diet managed by the medical team after initial assessment, etc.) Methods Data from bedside SLP evaluation or instrumental swallow evaluation (modified barium swallow study (MBSS) or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES)) during hospitalization were collected. Radiologic chest imaging reports from before and after MTL diets were reviewed for possible aspiration or aspiration pneumonia. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using Excel. Results Of 1000 charts reviewed, 162 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven of these 162 patients (4.3%) had radiologic findings suggesting concern for aspiration after the MTL diet was prescribed. Six of these patients had medical factors that contributed to the radiologic finding; thus, a direct relationship between MTL diet and concern for aspiration could not be established. Conclusions This study supports consideration of temporary MTL prescribed at bedside with a stringent algorithm, given the small number (4.3%) of patients with aspiration concerns after MTL diet on follow-up. This approach may shorten the time to oral diet and hospital discharge in carefully selected patients.

Indexed as

algorithmdysphagiamildly thickened liquidspatient safetyswallow study

Identifiers

PMID42572521
PMCPMC13452882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.