Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42572512›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Ureteric Recovery Without Stenting After Intraoperative De-ligation During Cesarean Section: A Case Report.

Ahmad S Abu Srour, Omar Hnaidi, Beshr Faiad, Yamen Al-Ahmad

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad S Abu SrourUrology, Arab Board Of Health Specializations, Damascus, SYR.
Omar HnaidiUrology, Ministry of Health, Sharjah, ARE.
Beshr FaiadUrology, Ministry of Health, Sharjah, ARE.
Yamen Al-AhmadUrology, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract injury during cesarean section is uncommon, but the risk is much higher in the case of multiple sections due to dense adhesions. Bladder injury is the most frequent. Accidental ureteric injury is also rare; however, the combination of bladder rupture, ureteric ligation, and massive uterine artery hemorrhage in a single operation is what happened in our case. Current guidelines recommend the placement of a ureteric stent after de-ligation, but this is a situation in which stenting was not technically achievable. We report a case of a 36-year-old woman, gravida 4 para 2, with two previous cesarean sections, who underwent emergency lower segment caesarean section at 39+1 weeks of gestation. During the operation, she had a complete bladder rupture, with additional retractor-related injury to the left posterior bladder wall near the trigone; suture ligation of the left distal ureter in three places during attempted control of broad-ligament bleeding; and severe hemorrhage from a torn left uterine artery. The intraoperative hemoglobin fell to 5.43 g/dL. The urology team controlled the bleeding, removed the three ureteric sutures and confirmed ureteric continuity, and repaired the bladder in two layers over a suprapubic catheter. A leak test was done after the repair and was negative for leakage. A ureteric stent could not be placed during the operation for several reasons. The priority was to stabilize the unstable patient and finish the operation as quickly as possible, since she had already lost more than 3 liters of blood, and there was a delay in providing blood products from the blood bank. At the index operation, no ureteric stents, ureteric catheters, or guidewires were available in theatre, and urological endoscopic equipment was not immediately accessible. In addition, the retractor injury had obscured the left ureteric orifice, so even a small Nelaton ureteric catheter could not be placed retrogradely. Accordingly, the urologist decided to finish the procedure with a plan to place a stent or nephrostomy after resuscitation, after discussing the case in MDT. The patient received four units of packed red cells, two units of fresh frozen plasma, one unit of platelets, cryoprecipitate, and tranexamic acid, and her hemoglobin recovered to 11.5 g/dL by day 9. Two post-op contrast CT urograms (day 2 and day 11) showed no contrast extravasation and no hydronephrosis. Renal-bladder ultrasound at six months showed normal kidneys, normal cortical thickness on the de-ligated side, and no significant post-void residual urine. Serum creatinine remained normal throughout follow-up. This case shows that a distal ureter that is recognized and de-ligated early may recover function without ureteric stenting, even after major bladder injury and significant blood loss. Early urological involvement, immediate de-ligation, direct inspection of the ureter, and careful bladder repair were the key elements of a good outcome. The case may be useful for surgeons working in settings of limited resources.

Indexed as

caesarean sectionconservative managementiatrogenic bladder injuryiatrogenic ureteral injuryureteric ligationureteric stenting

Identifiers

PMID42572512
PMCPMC13452953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.