Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42572393›Full record

SynthesisPsychological medicine2026

How much is sexual minority stress confounded with familial causes? A systematic multilevel meta-analysis.

Péter Przemyslaw Ujma, John D Haltigan, J Michael Bailey

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Péter Przemyslaw UjmaInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Semmelweis University: Semmelweis Egyetem, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-3009
John D HaltiganCenter for Heterodox Social Science, The University of Buckingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4729-6219
J Michael BaileyDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-1705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared with heterosexual persons, non-heterosexual persons have worse mental health. Sexual Minority Stress Theory (SMST) explains the disparity as resulting from stigma and discrimination. To the extent that heterosexual genetic relatives reared with non-heterosexual persons also have worse mental health, SMST is falsified. We conducted a systematic meta-analysis of studies containing family-genetic comparison data to interrogate the empirical support for SMST.

methodWe systematically identified 17 empirical studies in which twins or non-twin siblings reported on both their sexual orientation and their mental health. Subsequently, we conducted a multilevel meta-analysis, focusing on the degree to which any sexual orientation disparity in mental health diminished with genetic relatedness.

resultsMost of the mental health disparities between non-heterosexual and heterosexual persons were eliminated after controlling for family-genetic factors.

conclusionsThe mental health disparity between non-heterosexual and heterosexual persons is reduced by up to two-thirds once familial background factors are accounted for by comparing monozygotic twins discordant for sexual orientation. This suggests that shared familial causes, and not minority stress, are the most important causes of mental health disparities in non-heterosexual persons.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesHeterosexualitySexual and Gender MinoritiesStress, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleconfoundinggeneticsmental health disparitiesmeta-analysisminority stresssexual minority stresssexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID42572393
PMCPMC13468942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.