ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Data and Potentially Informative Visiting Process to Dynamically Predict Future Visit Times.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frequent visits in cohort studies are important as they enable, among others, the assessment of disease progression and treatment effectiveness. In HIV studies, extended intervals between visits have been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes (e.g., antiretroviral therapy interruption). Prediction of the next visit time can be a useful tool in identifying those more prone to (temporarily) disengage from care. Since visit times are to a large extent individually driven, patient characteristics such as longitudinal markers history and past visit patterns have to be taken into account when dealing with the prediction of future visit times. The topic of dynamic prediction has been developed greatly, especially within the framework of joint models of longitudinal and survival data. While joint models have been extended to account for an informative visiting process, little attention has been given in the dynamic prediction of the next visit time. In this study we propose a model for the joint analysis of a longitudinal continuous marker and the visiting process. A gap time mechanism is employed for the visiting process, while a linear mixed model is used for the marker. The two submodels are linked via correlated normally distributed random effects. The resulting form of the marginal likelihood requires only uni-dimensional integration, irrespective of the dimension of the random effects in the longitudinal model, a property that holds with multiple continuous markers. The model is used to derive dynamic predictions for the time to the next visit, conditioning on patient's previous gap times and marker history. The performance of the proposed methodology is assessed through simulation. Finally, we apply the proposed model to data of people living with HIV from the Athens Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.