Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42572360›Full record

ReviewMolecular informatics2026

Geometric Deep Learning-Based Drug Design Models for Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.

Amit Kumar Srivastav, Unnati Modi, Rahul Kumar, Dhiraj Bhatia, Raghu Solanki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit Kumar SrivastavDepartment of Microbiology Biochemistry and Immunology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-4197
Unnati ModiSchool of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Institute of Advanced Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-6771
Rahul KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Dr. B. R. A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Dhiraj BhatiaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-6417
Raghu SolankiDepartment of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-9961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural network (DNN)-based in silico models show great promise in predicting the properties and bioactivities of novel compounds, including small molecules. Among traditional approaches, structure-based drug design (SBDD) remains a fundamental approach for drug discovery using molecular docking, scoring functions, and molecular dynamics simulations. However, these approaches are often constrained by limited flexibility, resolution, and generalizability. Geometric deep learning (GDL) offers a transformative alternative by enabling models to learn directly from non-Euclidean molecular representations, such as graphs, point clouds, and meshes, capturing critical 3D spatial relationships inherent to protein-ligand interactions. This review highlights the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of GDL in small-molecule drug discovery, focusing on tasks including binding affinity prediction, virtual screening, de novo molecule generation, pose prediction, ADMET profiling, and protein flexibility modeling. We explore key GDL architectures, graph neural networks, SE(3)-equivariant networks, 3D convolutional neural networks, point cloud models, and geometric transformers, and assess their performance across various drug discovery benchmarks. The integration of geometry-aware AI models with experimental and computational workflows was also highlighted for its potential to streamline hit-to-lead optimization and advance rational drug design. Despite remarkable progress, the field faces challenges including limited high-quality 3D structural datasets, protein flexibility representation, and the interpretability of deep models. Addressing these issues through hybrid modeling approaches, multi-resolution learning, and self-supervised training could further elevate GDL's impact. Ultimately, GDL stands at the frontier of AI-enhanced pharmaceutical innovation, offering unprecedented precision, efficiency, and insight in the pursuit of next-generation therapeutics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DesignDrug DiscoverySmall Molecule LibrariesGraph Neural NetworksHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProteinsLigandsProteinsSmall Molecule Librariesdrug designdrug discoverygeometric deep learningsmall molecules

Identifiers

PMID42572360
PMCPMC13454516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.