Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42572359›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2026

Dynamic Risk Assessment for the Development of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches.

Alexei Nakonechnyi, Shaul Geliaks, Ilan Goldenberg, Dillon J Dzikowicz, Emre Aktas, Susan Schleede, Scott McNitt, Agam Purohit, Burr W Hall, Spencer Z Rosero and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexei NakonechnyiUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-5887-0424
Shaul GeliaksUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4417-9289
Ilan GoldenbergUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Dillon J DzikowiczUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-1927
Emre AktasUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Susan SchleedeUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Scott McNittUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Agam PurohitUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Burr W HallUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Spencer Z RoseroUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
David Z HuangUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Amole O OjoUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6082-535X
Wojciech ZarebaUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4146-420X
Michael ChristofUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0840-9095
Mehmet K AktasUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9003-9384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) frequently detect brief, often subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF), but their value for predicting progression to persistent AF remains uncertain. Statistical and machine learning (ML) approaches may enable dynamic risk stratification using this longitudinal device data.

objectiveTo develop a risk stratification model using clinical and CIED-derived AF burden measured over a rolling 6-month window to predict progression to persistent AF.

methodsWe analyzed continuous CIED data from 1985 patients without prior persistent AF implanted between 2016 and 2024 at a tertiary medical center. AF burden and clinical variables were summarized using overlapping 6-month rolling windows to estimate 1-year risk of persistent AF. Associations were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. A gradient-boosted decision tree model (XGBoost) was used to predict progression.

resultsDuring a mean follow-up of 1192 days, 874 patients (44%) developed paroxysmal AF, of whom 257 (29%) progressed to persistent AF after a mean of 813 days. Patients with no AF or < 1 h/day of AF in the prior 6 months had > 97% 1-year freedom from persistent AF, whereas those with > 8 h/day had a 63% progression rate. Higher AF burden was strongly associated with progression (maximum HR 8.66, p < 0.001). The ML model demonstrated high predictive performance (sensitivity 99.4%, specificity 95.7%).

conclusionCIED-detected AF burden is strongly associated with progression to persistent AF. ML-based analysis of 6-month device data enables accurate, point-in-time risk stratification to support earlier and more targeted clinical management.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationDefibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiographyMachine LearningAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentatrial fibrillationcardiac implantable electronic devicesdisease progressionmachine learningprediction modelrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42572359
PMCPMC13454548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.