ArticleBJPsych open2026
Attachment-related trauma markers and symptom severity in Afghan refugees.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfghan refugees experience high levels of cumulative trauma and psychosocial adversity, yet attachment-related trauma has rarely been examined at the narrative level. Narrative attachment assessments may capture culturally embedded expressions of distress beyond post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-focused symptom models.
aimsThis study examined narrative attachment-related trauma markers in Afghan refugees receiving out-patient psychological treatment. It investigated whether trauma marker frequency differed between resolved and unresolved attachment representations and whether it was associated with psychological symptom severity.
methodIn an exploratory cross-sectional study, 40 Afghan refugees (mean age = 25.4 years; 75% male) receiving out-patient psychological treatment completed the Adult Attachment Projective Picture System, a narrative-based attachment interview. Trauma markers were identified and quantified within the narratives. Associations with attachment representations (resolved versus unresolved) and psychological symptom severity were examined in a subsample with available self-report data (
resultsParticipants with unresolved attachment representations showed higher trauma marker frequencies than those with resolved representations. Trauma marker frequency was positively associated with depressive symptoms and overall psychological distress (Spearman's effect size estimate (
conclusionsTrauma markers captured clinically relevant distress in Afghan refugees beyond PTSD-specific symptomatology, particularly depressive symptoms and general psychological burden. Narrative, attachment-based approaches may be especially valuable in clinical encounters in which distress is conveyed implicitly, relationally, or in culturally contextualised ways rather than through explicit symptom reporting. Culturally sensitive applications of such methods, supported by well-trained interpreters, are essential for clinical understanding and meaningful clinical engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.